A [cyberthreat actor] has allegedly stolen a massive trove of sensitive data – including highly classified defense documents and missile schematics – from a state-run Chinese supercomputer in what could potentially constitute the largest known heist of data from China.
The dataset, which allegedly contains more than 10 petabytes of sensitive information, is believed by experts to have been obtained from the National Supercomputing Center (NSCC) in Tianjin – a centralized hub that provides infrastructure services for more than 6,000 clients across China, including advanced science and defense agencies.
Apparently data extraction took ~6 months. 10PiB of data. This is some serious stuff. Thoughts?
So this is a useful case study in bad journalism, and also a point I’m working through for IFIN. Here we have a single anonymous source making an unverifiable claim. Using the Admiralty Code, we would classify this as F4 or F5.
And broadly, this is how we should handle those ratings.